Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Freedomworks (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Free Market v. Big Government

Friday, May 19, 2017 7:41
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced, the Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act (S. 670) which has been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. On the surface this bill is being presented as consumer friendly, but when Sen. Warren introduces legislation that is allegedly opening up the market to lower the cost for consumers and increase competition, it is suspect to say the least.

The two main categories of devices this bill address are personal sound amplification products (PSAPs) and hearing aids. There is not a functional difference between hearing aids and personal sound amplification products, but the definition of each remains in the intended use of the device.

PSAPs are used to amplify environmental sound for non-hearing impaired consumers for example, listening to lectures, listening to soft sounds, or listening for prey while hunting, where a hearing aid is used for the purpose of compensating for hearing loss. Similarly, you can buy over-the-counter reading glasses inexpensively that contain magnified reading lenses, compared to prescription lenses which are at a much higher price point.

PASPs are not currently regulated by the FDA and are sold inexpensively over-the-counter. The cost of hearing aids is expensive, and typically not covered by insurance. When purchasing a hearing aid similar to prescription eyeglasses you are also paying a large service fee to the health care professional which can include a consultation, testing, fitting and cleanings. Hearing aids are considered medical devices and PSAPs do not fall under this classification for good reason.

Allowing communities to gain access to over-the-counter or mail order devices in turn dramatically lowers the cost. Since, the FDA does not distinguish the difference between these two products relying in function but the intent of the user, it is crucial we keep the government out of the sale of PSAPs.

Sen. Warren wants to hijack the idea of a free market, by implementing more regulations that will stifle competition and raise the cost of devices across the board.

A letter in opposition to the bill signed by free market, liberty minded organizations points to the Bose Corporation as a significant factor for this unnecessary regulatory rampage. Bose produces PSAPs and if they were able to sell these products with the help of FDA regulations it would be possible to sell PSAPs at a higher price point and market them as a novelty. It is no surprise that Bose lobbied in favor of this bill and the corporation is based out of Framingham, Massachusetts the state Sen.Warren represents.

This is purely cronyism, driven by a large company looking to use more government as a way to squash competition and hijack the market through government regulation to increase profit.

The proof is in the pudding, this bill would take away the state’s ability to provide less expensive devices to the consumer. Sen. Warren is not putting Americans best interest first, and with this bill would make it more difficult for people to gain access to PSAPs at a lower cost.



Source: http://www.freedomworks.org/content/free-market-v-big-government

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.